Ideological Evolutionary Theory (vs. Ideological Creationism)

People who believe that Jewish influence dictates the direction of society through the media have a most peculiar view if they believe that human behavior is genetically determined. If they believe in an ethnically based ideological determinism that dictates that Jews are just “acting as Jews because they are Jews” and non-Jewish Europeans are simply “acting as gullible Gentile Whites,” then they raise a contradiction to their own presumption of genetically inherited ideology when they focus on the environment (cable tv, the internet, newspapers). If people’s ideologies are more or less determined by how much Jewish blood they have, then how can Jews be influencing non-Jews? Are Jews natural leaders and Gentiles natural followers? If such a theory actually were true, the only solution to this problem would be genetic engineering! If the strength of genetic determinism cannot be mitigated, then why start a movement to convince people to change their viewpoints? If you believe that people can change their viewpoints, then should you not renounce your genetic determinism? If people can change their ideology voluntarily, then much of what white nationalists say is hogwash! The White Nationalists raise this own contradiction by pushing “Jew-genetic” determinism on one hand but raising the importance of the media environment on the other.

Obviously to argue that Jews control the thinking of non-Jews is to argue for a blank slate hypothesis in which white gentiles are programmable but blacks are subhuman and Jews act as a group. Notice that most people who “name the Jew” are information technology style nerds like Mike Conner who probably write computer programs and view White Gentiles as programmable beings.

Mike Connors’s “Name the Jew” Computer Program:

// below is programming code
// lol
string x_Jew = “follow me. I am the jew.”;
class white.ideology = x_Jew;

My response.
// x_Jew = strong and white.ideology = weak!

It would seem difficult to reconcile a belief in genetic determinism with a belief that the environment (which Jews allegedly control) sets the pace of society. However, it is insufficient to act offended when people push these theories. To combat the inconsistent babbling of the “name the Jew” crowd, it helps to both point out these inconsistencies and promote theories (instead of simply crying foul). One problem that I have had is that I have not promoted a theory to explain “why” we are in the situation we are in. A person who does not like me may think I am simply raising objections because I want to “defend the Jews.” The Basarab theory of ideological evolution will challenge this viewpoint and show that I have good and valid objections!

Evolution vs Creationism
Marxists who focus on dialectical materialism and class struggle are like evolutionists. They believe society evolves piece by piece and that the persuasive powers of the media are limited by the characteristics of the audience (contingent prejudices, assumptions, material conditions, market forces). In contrast, “right wingers” who blame the Jews are like creationists. They believe our society was just created by ideas that somehow the “blank slate” white Gentile European can absorb. These supposed “genetic determinists” believe that any ideology can be environmentally PUSHED on a “white gentile” society!

My viewpoint takes into account material conditions and argues that humans view the dissemination of propaganda through their own ideological lenses. People set goals to achieve outcomes and consider the material conditions, so while I reject hardcore genetic determinism of ideology, I do not believe an audience is a “blank slate” for a speaker either. According to my view, the media cannot just say anything it wants to and automatically transform society. My theory questions this, because society must move from “point a” to “point b” before it gets to “point c.” While I believe ideas and goals matter, goals and ideals cannot be utopian but must be materially based (and we can view humans as a resource for this purpose). An extreme economic determinist position argues that people’s ideologies are determined exclusively by their material conditions. This position is more extreme than Karl Marx’s position. Even Marx referred to ideology as important, but saw ideology as being tailored around real life conditions (dialectical materialism). Marx’s position has influenced my thinking because I believe it to be correct. The theory of the wns is more this : Jewish people have specific genetically-programmed interests. The Jews acted to push anti-racist ideas and push America into wars for Israel. They seized control of the media and disseminated their propaganda to achieve their outcome. The only material condition that matters to WNists is the amount of Jewish blood in MsNBC and Fox News!

My Rebuttal : Even if Jews control the media, they must operate within market forces. Let us pretend that Jews had an objective that everyone else vehemently opposed. In this scenario, Jews would still have have to compromise their arguments in a way to make them practical and achievable by building a consensus. To deny this fact is to argue that the rest of the society went along with the plan and questioned nothing. In that case society is to blame! To accept this is to argue that Gentile underlings and Jewish “masters” compromised! In that case, Gentiles are still to blame! Whether Gentiles simply lied down and let Jews control society or actively negotiated the outcome, the blame cannot be solely laid on Jews.

Regarding the media and its support for Israel : The media is controlled by corporations who need cash and see Israel as an ally. The same media works in a multi-racial and multi-regional American society (do not forget that I am Eastern Pennsylvania 100%)! Society is driven by an imperfect desire to secure its business position in an evolving market situation. The media cannot just say anything it wants to and automatically transform society. In summary, my theory (the Basarab theory of ideological evolution) postulates that this is not possible because of the reasons listed in this essay.

Nobody can reasonably believe that Jews operate external to the material conditions of society. Society was not a perfectly working computer program that got hacked by a Jewish virus, but instead a process of evolution of which Jews are an internal part affected by the same material conditions. I am arguing that even if Jews promoted the ideas, the material conditions are what allowed for the ideas to prevail.