Don't Believe in anything except Maoism and Human Race

Don't believe in culture since they are all based in a fake god wich his the opium of the people .
Don't Believe in any kind of races and ethnic groups because we are all the same except that some have darker skin colour.
Don't Believe in concept of nation because they was created to stop people from beeing free .
Don't Believe in this democracy and politicians .

I only believe in Marxist Leninism Maoísm and that we are all humans .

Could you explain why you believe these things? You did not explain yourself very well.

I don't believe in god because the guys who creat this term wanted to blind the people and have something to worship .
Look at the Roman Church they got millions because people give them money and we don't have any proof that god existed .

I also reject nations since they got created to show their power in relation to others and stop the people from living in what they want .
That's why you have control borders to stop people from coming to your nation .

Democracy and Politicians it's because borgeois democracy doesn't represent true democracy and politicians because they are all a bunch of liars who want power and money .

KimmiRaikonnen wrote:Don't believe in culture since they are all based in a fake god wich his the opium of the people .

So the traditions of French society are exactly the same as the traditions of Chinese society?

Don't Believe in any kind of races and ethnic groups because we are all the same except that some have darker skin colour.

This is debatable, but I don't have any statistics, and I'm no expert on the topic.

Don't Believe in concept of nation because they was created to stop people from beeing free .

How exactly does that make the concept of a nation illegitimate?

Don't Believe in this democracy and politicians .

Fair enough

I only believe in Marxist Leninism Maoísm and that we are all humans .

Sure

KimmiRaikonnen wrote:I don't believe in god because the guys who creat this term wanted to blind the people and have something to worship .
Look at the Roman Church they got millions because people give them money and we don't have any proof that god existed.

I'm an atheist too.

I also reject nations since they got created to show their power in realtion to others and stop the people from living in what they want .
That's why you have control borders to stop people from coming to your nation.

This sentence isn't making too much sense. I think that you're equating nations with the state though, which is not what my definition is.

Democracy and Politicians it's because borgeois democracy doesn't represent true democracy and politicians because they are all a bunch of liars who want power and money.

I agree.

This sentence isn't making too much sense. I think that you're equating nations with the state though, which is not what my definition is.

You only " have a nation " because you born in some country wich make being part of chinese nation or french but if you didn't have any nations you can judge the people because of their nations since they won't exist anymore .
IF stalin doesn't got killed in 1953 we and Mao was thinking to merge the two nation in one and i'm sure that if they do that today we would live in a socialist society without any nation .

I actually like Mao and the cultural revolution, as well as many Maoists themselves. Alls I have to say to this is... cool story bro.

KimmiRaikonnen wrote:Don't believe in culture since they are all based in a fake god wich his the opium of the people

Religion is but one facet of culture. Language, customs, cuisine, etc. are all aspects of culture, and they exist irrespective of whether or not you "believe in" them. Religion may be problematic for a number of reasons, but that's a separate issue.

Don't Believe in any kind of races and ethnic groups because we are all the same except that some have darker skin colour.

Race simply describes the heritable features (e.g., skin color and hair texture) of different populations. Like culture, it matters not whether you, or anyone else, believes in it. Distinguishing groups of people based off of their appearance is something we all do, and it's completely benign.

Don't Believe in concept of nation because they was created to stop people from beeing free

"Free" in what sense? If the people democratically decide to maintain borders and immigration laws, it cannot be said to be oppressive.

Don't Believe in this democracy and politicians

No revolutionary socialist believes in bourgeois "democracy."

I only believe in Marxist Leninism Maoísm and that we are all humans

Okay..?

Celtiberian wrote:Religion is but one facet of culture. Language, customs, cuisine, etc. are all aspects of culture, and they exist irrespective of whether or not you "believe in" them. Religion may be problematic for a number of reasons, but that's a separate issue.

Langue was all the same but when people start to adapt new forms of words and writting they start to be different .
Why roman church used to speak only in Latin ?
It's because the languange was the same and commmon to all peoples .
Costums are created by Religions or do you think that muslim country want a woman to be their slaves if that wasn't written in Coran ?
Cuisine is different in most of cultures do the lack of certain things in parts of the world .
Do you think that a European from XIV would eat Caril like the indians ?

Race simply describes the heritable features (e.g., skin color and hair texture) of different populations. Like culture, it matters not whether you, or anyone else, believes in it. Distinguishing groups of people based off of their appearance is something we all do, and it's completely benign.

Do you know that Skin color make us different because when the human race start the miggrations some of them who lived in Hot sun of africa produce more Melanina and then get their skin color more dark and with europeans it's the same .
No it's not since if you distinguish a black guy from a white one only by their color you are a racist since you are put a " tag " on the guy .

"Free" in what sense? If the people democratically decide to maintain borders and immigration laws, it cannot be said to be oppressive.

If you allow immigration laws you are acting oppresive to other people who want to be part of your land .

KimmiRaikonnen wrote:Langue was all the same but when people start to adapt new forms of words and writting they start to be different

It's debatable as to whether or not there was ever a point wherein human beings all practiced the "same" language. Geographic isolation was a major factor contributing to the emergence of diverse languages, but even within a relatively close proximity, distinct languages can arise.

Why roman church used to speak only in Latin ?
It's because the languange was the same and commmon to all peoples

It was "common" only to those populations once under the ancient Roman sphere of influence. It subsequently spread to other parts of the world via imperialism.

Costums are created by Religions or do you think that muslim country want a woman to be their slaves if that wasn't written in Coran ?

Once again, religion hasn't affected every facet of culture. Certain interpretations of Islam are indeed responsible for the sexist cultural practices in the Muslim world, but many of their customs derive from per-Muslim practices as well. In fact, all of the Abrahamic religions adapted to regional cultural peculiarities, and several of the ostensibly Abrahamic religious rituals were themselves derived from earlier pagan ceremonial practices.

Cuisine is different in most of cultures do the lack of certain things in parts of the world .

Obviously. But even with the ascendancy of international trade, local recipes have been preserved and are still regarded as aspects of people's culture.

Do you know that Skin color make us different because when the human race start the miggrations some of them who lived in Hot sun of africa produce more Melanina and then get their skin color more dark and with europeans it's the same

Yes, I'm well aware of the adaptationist explanation. In my opinion, it unjustifiably marginalizes the role sexual selection could have had.

No it's not since if you distinguish a black guy from a white one only by their color you are a racist since you are put a " tag " on the guy

Racism defines the oppression of racial groups, typically on the basis of alleged physical or intellectual inferiority. Understanding that Chinese people are physically distinguishable from Australian aborigines, however, is simply a confirmation of one's visual perception functioning correctly.

If you allow immigration laws you are acting oppresive to other people who want to be part of your land

Using this logic, it would be "oppressive" to deny interested parties access to my home. Individuals concerned with the maintenance of their ethnocultural and/or ecological integrity would consider the unobstructed flow of people into different territories "oppressive." Extenuating circumstances obviously exist, which is why a system of international law is necessary.

How exactly would you ensure that your cosmopolitan policy be implemented if the people democratically decided against it?

KimmiRaikonnen, what you say makes so little sense I don't even know if I should reply... oh well, I haven't been on here in ages so I might as well get my hands dirty.

Why is it so wrong for people to want to maintain their culture? I'm not really part of the "crowd" on this site with my views on nationalism and multiculturalism, but it seriously bothers me when people like you try to come across with your "destroy all culture!!!" ideas. Maybe at one point we all used the same kind of spears and communicated with the same grunts and belches, but that doesn't mean we have to turn the world into a cultural smoothie and completely wipe out any sense of culture a nation has. As for race, I'm not against non-"native" peoples living in a particular country or people race mixing as long as they actually show interest in becoming a part of that culture, but I would not like to see any group of people who could be identified as a certain "race" to die out.

More to the point, I like being able to enjoy English culture, Indian culture, Greek culture, Scandinavian culture and so forth. That doesn't mean I want to completely wipe them out by forcing them into each other. Why is this so wrong? I like being able to see white people, black people, Asian people and whoever else, so why is it wrong to not want everyone to eventually blend into one race from mass race and culture mixing? I like the colours blue and red, but that doesn't mean I can't or shouldn't be able to enjoy them separately. Many people such as yourself who promote "multiculturalism" are basically expressing anti-culturalism. Do you want every species of animal to turn into one strange mixed species creature as well?

Nothing against Marxist-Leninists, but it most of the crazy leftists seem to be from that house...